USPTO serial 86874049
A NEW PHILOSOPHY OF SOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A NEW PHILOSOPHY OF SOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean,
PAUL A. MCLEAN, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOREAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | High-end luxury speakers and acoustic products, namely, audio speakers, wireless audio speakers, wireless outdoor speakers, audio speaker bars, subwoofers, headphones and ear buds, bass shakers, namely, electromechanical tactile transducers, digital music players, and digital music controllers, namely, remote controls for audio speakers, wireless audio speakers, wireless outdoor speakers, audio speaker bars, subwoofers, bass shakers, namely, electromechanical tactile transducers; High-end luxury speakers and acoustic products, namely, remote controls for audio speakers, wireless audio speakers, wireless outdoor speakers, audio speaker bars, subwoofers, bass shakers, namely, electromechanical tactile transducers, digital music players, computers, tablets and smartphones used for selection and setting of cloud-based music services, and computers, tablets and smartphones used for setting playing zones in home audio networks; downloadable audio smartphone software applications for controlling audio volume, input source selection, audio equalizing setting, speaker pairing, audio stabilization, audio clarification, and for controlling speakers, amplifiers, stereo systems, home theater systems, home entertainment systems, digital music systems, audio speaker bars, subwoofers, bass shakers, namely, electromechanical tactile transducers, digital music players; audio accessories, namely, travel kits comprising battery power chargers for use in cars, wall battery power chargers, international wall socket electrical adapters, external battery packs, and audio and power cables, computer tablet docking stations and holders in the nature of carrying cases specifically adapted for computer tablets, and battery chargers; consumer electronic products, namely, audio amplifiers, audio speakers, audio receivers, electrical audio and speaker cables and connectors, audio decoders, video decoders, speakers, power conversion devices, power converters, and power inverters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |