USPTO serial 86875471
ANTI-DUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTI-DUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kornwestheim, DE
Kornwestheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Vande Sande
THOMAS J. VANDE SANDE HALL & VANDE SANDE, LLC10220 RIVER ROAD, SUITE 200POTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Blowing machines for the compression, exhaustion and transport of gases; air suction machines; air brushes for applying color; spray guns for paint; valves as machine components; pressure reducers as parts of machines; pressure regulators being parts of machines; machine couplings other than for land vehicles; dust removing installations for cleaning purposes, namely, dust separators; electric apparatus for cleaning, namely, electric machines for cleaning industrial machines; and cleaning apparatus for industrial purposes, namely, cleaning machines to clean industrial machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Respirators for filtering air; breathing apparatus, except for artificial respiration, namely, rebreathers; respiratory masks, other than for artificial respiration, for non-medical purposes; filters for respiratory masks; gas pressure indicators; ion beam supply apparatus, namely, particle accelerators; ionizing apparatus, namely, ionizing air guns, not for the treatment of air; ionizing apparatus, namely, ionizing guns, not for the treatment of air; and ionization apparatus for use in the surface treatment of materials, namely, machine components | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric machines and apparatus for cleaning air | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SATA GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by SATA GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ANTI-DUST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |