USPTO serial 86875891
TRAFFICAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAFFICAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
40789 Monheim am Rhein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Geissler
MARTIN R. GEISSLER MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measurement devices for traffic safety technology, in particular distance, speed and traffic control devices as well as traffic monitoring devices, in particular for red-light monitoring, for recording vehicle registration marks, for recording and verifying the payment of road tolls, for recording traffic density, traffic flow, and vehicle types; electric, electronic, and optoelectronic sensors, especially for the aforementioned devices, in particular radar sensors, laser sensors, piezo sensors, induction loops, and video cameras; electronic and optoelectronic sensors; position control and docking sensors; tactile and non-contact sensors and measuring heads; electric measuring devices; radar devices; antennas; storage devices for data processing systems; image receiving devices; image reproduction devices; time-recording devices; analytical devices, not used for medical purposes; flashlight devices; data processing devices for data evaluation; optical signaling systems (traffic lights and variable traffic signs); electric traffic information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware; Installation, repair, operation and maintenance of data technology installations (hardware) in particular of traffic monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing digital measurement data, analysis and processing of measured data in particular of traffic monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |