CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOBILE VIDEO COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 86876117

MOBILE VIDEO COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE VIDEO COMPUTING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl M. Davis II

CARL M. DAVIS II BAKER DONELSON3414 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036insurance claims processing for road side assistance related to claims documentation and tracking providersACTIVE—
037emergency roadside assistance services, namely, responding to calls for roadside assistance, flat tire changing, emergency fuel supply and battery jump startingACTIVE—
039motor vehicle towing and roadside assistance services in the nature of vehicle accident and breakdown towing servicesACTIVE—
042engineering for vehicle communications specification and design; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for emergency medical service (EMS) vehicle tracking, monitoring, operation and reporting and for control of on-board EMS inventory supply; providing temporary use of a web-based fleet management software application for tracking, monitoring, and reporting on motor vehicle fleet operations of others, motor vehicle locations, status, and incidents involving motor vehicles thereof and for crash detection, assessment, response and documentation involving vehicle fleets of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 8, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 2, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 2, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance