Drawing for ECONSOLUTIONS BY HDL

USPTO serial 86876878

ECONSOLUTIONS BY HDL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5057994Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 11, 2016
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with ECONSOLUTIONS BY HDL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. WHITLOW BIVENS

D. WHITLOW BIVENS MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT, LLP225 BroadwaySUITE 1900San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Services provided to assist local governments with economic development, namely, business data analysis, analysis of market research data, economic forecasting and analysis, and market reports and studiesACTIVEApr 28, 2015
036Services provided to assist local governments with economic development, namely, financial analysis and financial managementACTIVEApr 28, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 23, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2022NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2022C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 22, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance