USPTO serial 86876988
POWDERPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWDERPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica L. Dias
MONICA L. DIAS FROST BROWN TODD LLC3300 GREAT AMERICAN TWR., 301 E. 4TH ST.CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Flooring materials; ceramic materials for flooring; concrete flooring materials; flooring compounds of synthetic resins; flooring made of cork; flooring made of wood; flooring of plastic materials; flooring of reinforced plastic materials; liquid foundation surfacing materials for the coating of flooring; non-metallic building materials for flooring; non-metallic flooring; non-metallic flooring boards; non-metallic flooring components; non-metallic flooring materials; non-metallic flooring panels; non-metallic flooring surface materials; non-metallic flooring tiles; parquet flooring; plastic flooring materials; polystyrene flooring materials; resinous flooring materials; tile floorings, not of metal; ceramic floor coverings; ceramic floor tiles; ceramic tiles for covering floors; floor boards; floor coverings; floor tiles, not of metal; floors, not of metal; foamed plastic for use as layers in floors in gymnasia and sporting facilities; formless non-metallic materials for surfacing floors; materials of concrete for coating floors; materials of mortar for coating floors; non-metallic building materials for floors; non-metallic building materials for use in relation to floors; non-metallic floors; non-metallic materials for making floors; non-metallic materials for use as floor coatings; non-metallic materials for use in making floors; non-metallic materials for use in repairing floors; non-metallic materials for use in surfacing floors ; non-metallic surfacing for floors; non-metallic tiles for floors; parquet floor boards; vinyl floor coverings for forming a floor; wooden floor boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |