USPTO serial 86877455
HZT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HZT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garrett Atkinson
GARRETT ATKINSON MH2 TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP, LLP1951 KIDWELL DR.TYSONS CORNER, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation services for oil and gas field equipment, namely, installing couplings for connecting together pipes and connecting downhole tubing | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2019 |
| 040 | Custom thread-forming services, namely, custom manufacturing of threads on pipes and tubing, and of threads of pipe couplings, tubing couplings, pipe joints, and tubing connections | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Certus Energy Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Certus Energy Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CERTUS MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named HZT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 14, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |