Drawing for SAVOR

USPTO serial 86877484

SAVOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth Fulkerson

BETH FULKERSON Culhane Meadows PLLC30 South Wacker Drive, 22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Notebooks, photo albums, and stationery; paper goods for life events, namely, napkins; memory and organizational boxes made of fabric-covered paperboard; crafting supplies for scrapbooks, baby books and photo albums, namely, craft paper; office supplies, namely, paper boxes, notebooks and journalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2018INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 2, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 23, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 6, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance