Drawing for PANCHO PISTOLAS AUTHENTIC MEXICAN RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 86877821

PANCHO PISTOLAS AUTHENTIC MEXICAN RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PANCHO PISTOLAS AUTHENTIC MEXICAN RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JUAN M. SOLIZ

JUAN M. SOLIZ Law Office Of Juan M Soliz3203 S Pulaski RdChicago, IL 60623-4920UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Provision of food and drink in restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2019PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 5, 2019PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 21, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 31, 2019ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Jan 24, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 28, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
May 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance