Drawing for ICELAND HIGHTECH IRRIGATION SYSTEM

USPTO serial 86879084

ICELAND HIGHTECH IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICELAND HIGHTECH IRRIGATION SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for irrigation control, namely, electrical controls for irrigation sprinkler systems and software for controlling the watering, including automatic watering, of plants, parks, installations, layout, land, golf courses, crops and livestockABANDONED—
042Design and development of apparatus, instruments, products and software for controlling watering, including automatic wateringABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance