Drawing for REALTIME ONCOLOGY

USPTO serial 86879652

REALTIME ONCOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALTIME ONCOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca G. Rudich

TINH T NGUYEN VEDDER PRICE PC1633 BROADWAY31ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Science and technology services, namely, scientific research in the field of cancer treatment and diagnosticsACTIVE—
044Human health care services, namely, decision support and medical diagnostics, in the field of cancerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 16, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 16, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 7, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 15, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 5, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 5, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance