USPTO serial 86879808

NAKED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jan 19, 2016
Status date: Oct 21, 2019
Registration date: —
Examiner: NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAKED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

Owner

Naked Labs, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Naked Labs, Inc.
Naked Labs, Inc.
Redwood City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Naked Labs, Inc.
GREYSCALE HOLDINGS INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by GREYSCALE HOLDINGS INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Hwang

Susan Hwang Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP333 South Hope Street, 43rd FlLos Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
044	Providing online advice in the field of medical testing services, namely, physical fitness evaluation services	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 21, 2019	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2019	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2019	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Sep 23, 2019	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2019	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Mar 23, 2019	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Mar 22, 2019	EX5G	SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	—
Mar 20, 2019	EXT5	SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED	—
Mar 20, 2019	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2019	AITU	CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL	—
Mar 3, 2019	EPPA	TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2018	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Sep 18, 2018	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Sep 18, 2018	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Sep 18, 2018	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2018	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
May 21, 2018	COAR	TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	—
Jan 20, 2018	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jan 18, 2018	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Jan 18, 2018	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Jan 18, 2018	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2017	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Jul 12, 2017	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Jul 12, 2017	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Jul 12, 2017	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2016	EXRA	NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED	—
Nov 16, 2016	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Nov 16, 2016	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Nov 16, 2016	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2016	NOAM	NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2016	NPUB	OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED	—
Jul 26, 2016	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016	NONP	NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED	—
Jun 17, 2016	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 17, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 17, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 17, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016	GPRN	NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2016	GPRA	PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2016	CPRA	PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN	A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 3, 2016	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 25, 2016	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jan 22, 2016	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance