Drawing for CERVEJA PILSEN GOLDEN BEER CLASSIC

USPTO serial 86880869

CERVEJA PILSEN GOLDEN BEER CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEN, ELIZABETH S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERVEJA PILSEN GOLDEN BEER CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivian Ortiz Ponce

Vivian Ortiz Ponce MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSP.O. Box 9024163San Juan, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 24, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2016ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 11, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
May 11, 2016RTTPRESTORE TO TEAS PLUS—
May 11, 2016RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
May 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance