Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 86881376?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/86881376. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CANDLER HOTEL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 86881376, the listed owner(s) include: REM Associates, L.P..

What is USPTO serial number 86881376?

Serial number 86881376 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CANDLER HOTEL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CANDLER HOTEL?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 86881376

CANDLER HOTEL

Q: What is the current status of CANDLER HOTEL?

CANDLER HOTEL (86881376) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jan 20, 2016
Status date: Sep 10, 2019
Registration date: —
Examiner: RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANDLER HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

REM Associates, L.P.
Santa Barbara, CA
Other trademarks owned by REM Associates, L.P.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernard R. Gans

JESSICA BROMALL SPARKMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS, 7TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	Hotel services; hotel related services, namely, making hotel reservations for others, providing temporary lodging services in the nature of a hotel, providing food and beverages services at a hotel	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 10, 2019	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 10, 2019	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 10, 2019	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 27, 2019	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
May 13, 2019	ATRV	ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Apr 8, 2019	RBFT	REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES	—
Mar 11, 2019	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Mar 11, 2019	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Mar 11, 2019	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jan 8, 2019	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Oct 23, 2018	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 23, 2018	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 23, 2018	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Oct 1, 2018	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 1, 2018	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 28, 2018	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 28, 2018	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 28, 2018	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Sep 27, 2018	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Mar 27, 2018	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Mar 27, 2018	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2018	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2018	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 7, 2018	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 7, 2018	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2017	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2017	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2017	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 14, 2017	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 14, 2017	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2017	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2017	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 24, 2017	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 19, 2017	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 22, 2016	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
Dec 21, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2016	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Dec 21, 2016	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Dec 8, 2016	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2016	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2016	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jan 26, 2016	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Jan 23, 2016	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—