USPTO serial 86882023
DISTRICT 77
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISTRICT 77?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lachine Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S. ROTH
GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's clothing/apparel, namely, jeans, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets, pants, vests, shorts, overalls, jumpers, sweaters, sweat shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, hats and dresses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |