Drawing for BIRDSONG

USPTO serial 86883927

BIRDSONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIRDSONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt Koenig

KURT KOENIG KOENIG & ASSOCIATES920 GARDEN STSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine; WinesACTIVEApr 29, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 19, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 19, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 7, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 27, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 27, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 5, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 5, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance