Drawing for BITTER BATTLE

USPTO serial 86884007

BITTER BATTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BITTER BATTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward B. Marvin

EDWARD B MARVIN GUNN LEE & CAVE P C300 CONVENT STREETSUITE 1080SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2020TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 15, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 25, 2018RGTRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST—
Jan 5, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance