USPTO serial 86885361
DURA FIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2018
- Examiner
- MAZZELLA, BRANDY BARRETT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with DURA FIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany J. Maxey-Fisher
Brittany J. Maxey-Fisher Maxey-Fisher, PLLC100 Second Avenue South, Suite 401NSt. Petersburg, FL 33701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Bath sponges; Brushes used for cleaning medical instruments; Brushes for cleaning golf equipment; Cleaning brushes for household use; Cleaning brushes for musical instruments; Cleaning cloths; Cleaning sponges; Cleaning pads; Cleaning rags; Cloths for cleaning; Dusting brushes; Dusting gloves; Dusting and cleaning cloths; Fabric clean room wipes; Facial sponges for applying make-up; Facial cleansing sponges; Glossing cloths; Grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushes; Mitts of fabric for cleaning; Mops; Pet grooming device comprising a built in brush head and an attachment that connects to a water source; Pet grooming device comprising a built in brush head and an attachment that connects to vacuums; Pet brushes; Polishing cloths; Polishing gloves; Pre-moistened towelettes; Pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning; Sponges for applying body powder; Sponges for household purposes; Toilet sponges; Washing cloths; Wiping cloths, namely, chamois; Wiping cloths, namely, shammies; Car washing mitts; Cleaning mitts of fabric; Cleaning and polishing cloths; Cleaning, dusting and polishing cloths; Cloth for wiping and dusting; Exfoliating mitts; Eyeglass cleaning cloths; Floor polish applicators mountable on a mop handle; Floor polish applicators mounted on mop handles; Floor wax applicator mountable on a mop handle; Gun cleaning cloths; Microdermabrasion sponges for cosmetic use; Multipurpose wiping cloth for use with infants and toddlers; Scouring sponges; Scrub sponges; Shoe polishing mitts; Swabs and sponges for cleaning medical instruments; Toiletry sponges | ACTIVE | Apr 3, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Oct 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |