USPTO serial 86885491
CERTIFIED GLUTEN-FREE GLUTENFREECERT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTIFIED GLUTEN-FREE GLUTENFREECERT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Donnelly
Diane Donnelly VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, JANSSEN & GIORDANO60 EAST 42ND STREETSuite 1948NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | the processing, production, harvesting, preparation, transport and storage of cereals, raw grains and seeds; the processing, transportation and storage of manufactured meats and poultry; the processing, manufacture, transportation and storage of fish and seafood; the processing, transportation and storage of milk, cheese and dairy products; the processing, transportation and storage of sweeteners and syrups; the processing, transportation and storage of eggs and egg products; the processing, transportation and storage of baked and extruded snack products and cake mix formulations; the processing, transportation, distribution and storage of fruits and vegetables, the foregoing excluding fruit and vegetables juices; beverage manufacturing, namely, the fermentation, concentration, aseptic filling and drying operations processes for fruit and vegetable fruit juices, cordial, carbonated soft drinks, carbonated and non-carbonated waters, mineral waters, ice wine, alcoholic beverages, powdered beverage formulations, tea and coffee products; the processing, transportation and storage of confectioneries; the manufacture, blending, transportation and storage of pharmaceuticals and natural health products, the foregoing not including health supplements; the processing, blending, re-packaging, transportation and storage of dry foods and ingredients, namely, spices, seasonings, cultures, preservatives, yeast and processing aids; the manufacture of animal and vegetable oils and fats and margarine; the processing of cereal and snack products; the processing, transportation and storage of low acid canned foods; the processing, receipt, controlled temperature storage and transportation of prepared foods that require cooking and heating prior to serving; the manufacture, blending, transportation and storage of dietary supplements; the manufacture, storage and transportation of food section packaging materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |