USPTO serial 86886555
PAYDENTITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2019
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with PAYDENTITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NICOSIA, GB
EAST MELBOURNE VIC, AU
EAST MELBOURNE VIC, AU
EAST MELBOURNE VIC, AU
LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany Kandela
Brittany Kandela KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1801 Century Park East #2300Los Angeles, CA 90067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for controlling, namely, electrical controlling devices for the processing of data; Apparatus for data processing; Apparatus for electronic information processing, namely, computers, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices; Apparatus for information processing, namely, computers, computer servers; Apparatus for processing data; Apparatus for processing digital data; Apparatus for processing information, namely, computers, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices; Apparatus for the processing of data; Apparatus for the processing of digital information, namely, computers, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices, optical reading devices; Automatic money processing apparatus for the delivery of money, namely, automatic teller machines; Automatic money processing apparatus for the storage of money, namely, automatic teller machines; Credit card processing terminals, namely, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices, optical reading devices; Data information processing apparatus; Data processing apparatus for use in information storage; Data processing apparatus for use with computers; Data processing installations incorporating expandable architecture in the nature of computer servers, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices, optical reading devices; Installations for data processing in the nature of computer servers, payment terminal, payment network, biometric scanners, near field communications devices, optical reading devices; Installations for the electronic processing of data in the nature of computer servers, payment terminals, payment networks; Computer programs for processing data on computers; Computer terminals for data processing; Point-of-sale terminals for electronically processing credit card payments; Point-of-sale terminals for processing credit card transactions; Point-of-sale terminals for processing credit cards; Money transfer terminals in the nature of point-of-sale terminals; Automatic payment machines, namely, automatic teller machines; Point-of-sale terminals for the electronic payment of charges with credit cards; Electronic verification apparatus, namely, biometric scanners, near field communications devices, wireless communication devices, magnetic stripe readers, optical reading devices; Identification card verification apparatus comprising computer hardware and software for scanning and verifying the authenticity of an identification card; Document verification apparatus comprising computer hardware and software for scanning and verifying the authenticity of a document; Magnetically encoded banking cards, namely, credit cards for credit purposes; Magnetically encoded credit cards | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
| 035 | Computerized data verification, namely, employment verification; Data verification, namely, employment verification; Business administration assistance, namely, processing in the nature of filing of credit card statements | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
| 036 | Collection agencies, namely, collection of payments; Electronic payment services, namely, processing of credit card and debit card payments; Financial payment services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; Financial transaction services, namely, credit card verification services; Payment administration services in the nature of annuity services, namely, distribution of annuity funds; Payment transaction card services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Processing of debit card payments; Processing of credit card and debit card payments for banks; Electronic money transfer services; Banking services, namely, money deposit services; Money transfer services; Financial advisory services relating to credit; Issuance of credit cards; Issuing of credit cards; Debit card services, namely, issuing prepaid debit cards; Payment data verification services | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
| 040 | Processing of credit card statements, namely, printing of credit card statements for others | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
| 042 | Authentication services for electronic documents and e-mail | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
| 045 | Identity theft and fraud prevention services; Identity verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Providing authentication of personal identification information; Providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions; On-line identity reliability investigation in the field of on-line dating and claims made about age, gender; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via secure storage and transmitting such information via the Internet; Data verification in the nature of identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Financial identity monitoring services for fraud protection purposes; Monitoring of credit reports, the Internet, and public records to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; Electronic digital signature verification services provided in connection with citizens petitions, initiatives, recalls and referenda for security purposes; Electronic signature verification services provided in connection with citizens petitions, initiatives, recalls and referenda for security purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROBANX SOLUTIONS UK LTD
- Other trademarks owned by iSignthis Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by iSignthis Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by iSignthis Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by PROBANX HOLDINGS LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PAYDENTITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |