CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOBILE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 86886949

MOBILE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE COMPUTING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl M. Davis II

CARL M. DAVIS II BAKER DONELSON3414 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1600ATLANTA, GA 30326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video imaging and location determining devices, namely, digital video recorder, gps location device, camera and microphone, and vehicle status and operation sensors, sold as a system for tracking, monitoring, and documenting operation of motor vehicles; telematics communication devices, namely, wireless internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function for communicating video imaging and location information for monitoring fleet motor vehicles of others; vehicle status and operation sensors; hardware and computer software for use on motor vehicles with respect to fleet tracking, monitoring of fleet motor vehicles of others, reporting of status and incidents involving fleet motor vehicles of others, crash detection, crash reporting devices, assessment of status of and incidents involving fleet motor vehicles of others, response by and documentation of independent responders to incidents involving fleet motor vehicles of others, and reporting of status, incidents, and responses to incidents involving fleet motor vehicles of others; computer hardware and software for emergency medical service (EMS) motor vehicle monitoring, operation and reporting and control of on-board EMS inventory; computer hardware and software system for use in providing driver assistance, autonomous vehicle operation and vehicle-to-vehicle communication of vehicle operation and status informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance