Drawing for ORAH

USPTO serial 86888113

ORAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Zellerbach and Eileen Z. Aghnami

THOMAS H. ZELLERBACH AND EILEEN Z. AGHNAMI ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLPIP PROSECUTION2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Platform as a service (PAAS), software as a service (SAAS), and web hosting platforms featuring computer software platforms for creating, editing, manipulating, viewing, and integrating virtual reality and other videos, audio, films, clips, photographs, video content, and imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance