USPTO serial 86888437
THAI UNION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2022
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with THAI UNION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Samutsakorn, TH
Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Samutsakorn, TH
Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Samutsakorn, TH
Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Beverly
Brian Beverly Beeson Skinner Beverly, LLPOne Kaiser Plaza, Suite 750Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seasoning sauces; instant rice, frozen rice; confectionery made from cereal; confectionery made from flour; packaged meals consisting primarily of rice; packaged meals consisting primarily of noodles; packaged meals consisting primarily of flour-based ingredients; bread; dim sums, namely, dumplings | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing and processing food to the order and specification of others; manufacturing animal food to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Thai Union Group Public Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named THAI UNION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |