USPTO serial 86889586
ON-GARD THEFT PROTECTION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2016
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ON-GARD THEFT PROTECTION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY J. FEATHERS
Timothy J. Feathers Stinson LLP1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900KANSAS CITY, MO 64106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing anti-theft warranty programs on goods manufactured by others, namely, a vehicle theft reimbursement program in the nature of financial reimbursement for costs associated with theft of a vehicle | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2013 |
| 040 | Providing anti-theft deterrents, namely, etching of a sequence of traceable identification numbers on automobile windows, so as to identify a particular automobile subject to tracing after theft | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MPP Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MPP Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MPP Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ON-GARD THEFT PROTECTION SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 19, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 19, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |