Drawing for RAINBOW 8

USPTO serial 86890055

RAINBOW 8

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAINBOW 8?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Jung

2 HARBOR PARK DRIVEPORT WASHINGTON, NY 11050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Application software for the control of lighting systems, namely, software for remotely controlling lighting devices; Light emitting diodes (LED); LED with plugs; Lighting control apparatus; Lighting controlsACTIVE—
011Light emitting diode (LED); Lighting fixtures; LED light bulbs; LED mood lights; Electric light bulbs; Electric lighting fixtures; Light bulbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 25, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 5, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance