USPTO serial 86890122
HELPING HAND 911
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELPING HAND 911?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D. Murray
PETER D. MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | battery-operated emergency response system for elderly persons, invalids, and the like, comprising wireless communication devices for voice transmission, which can be worn as a pendant | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2016 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |