CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MARIE & CECILE ALBRECHT-BLEGER

USPTO serial 86890412

MARIE & CECILE ALBRECHT-BLEGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARIE & CECILE ALBRECHT-BLEGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB10TH FLOOR666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beers; wines, wines protected by an appellation of origin, table wines, sparkling wines, semi-sparkling wines, crémants, alcoholic beverages containing fruit, alcoholic aperitifs, eau-de-vie brandy, spirits and liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2017TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 10, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance