Drawing for LOCKDOWN ALARM

USPTO serial 86890565

LOCKDOWN ALARM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOCKDOWN ALARM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Morehouse

ERIC D MOREHOUSE KENEALY VAIDYA LLP3000 K STREET NWSUITE 310WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services in the field of school safety, school security and crisis preparedness; training services in the field of security and crisis preparedness for schools, hospitals, college campuses, malls, public buildings, office buildings, and other commercial buildingsACTIVEMay 18, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2017EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Dec 19, 2016RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Nov 17, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 20, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 20, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 19, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance