Drawing for DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 86891039

DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane Lambillotte

Diane Lambillotte Arent Fox LLP555 West Fifth Street, 48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for use in design and manufacture of vehicles and automobiles; software for use in design and manufacture of industrial goodsACTIVE—
012four-wheeled motor vehicles and structural parts therefor; automobiles and structural parts therefor; automobile chassisACTIVE—
040custom manufacture of automobile and vehicles; custom manufacture of joint systems for carbon fiber tubing; research in the field of manufacturing processes; research and consulting in the field of manufacture of vehicles and automobilesACTIVE—
042research and consulting in the field of design of vehicles and automobiles and manufacturing equipment therefor; research and consulting in the field of technology, namely, design, production and manufacture of carbon fiber materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 8, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 15, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance