USPTO serial 86891154
COURTPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COURTPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Budapest, HU
Budapest, HU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable cameras incorporating hardware, firmware, mobile and desktop software designed for tennis players to analyze various aspects of their tennis game including serve speed, ball trajectories, bounce and hit points, and to provide an electronic line judge functionality; computer software for tennis players to analyze various aspects of their tennis game including serve speed, ball trajectories, bounce and hit points, and to provide an electronic line judge functionality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |