Drawing for COLLECTPLUS

USPTO serial 86891515

COLLECTPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLLECTPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer application software for personal computer operating systems, the world wide web, and mobile devices, namely, software for use in debt collectionACTIVEJun 15, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 8, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 14, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jul 5, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 5, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 5, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 2017PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 28, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance