Drawing for AUDIOGRAPH

USPTO serial 86892746

AUDIOGRAPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOGRAPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John B. Greenberg

JOHN B. GREENBERG LEWIS RICE LLC600 WASHINGTON AVENUESUITE 2500ST. LOUIS, MO 63101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for creating digital watermarks and digital signatures; computer software, namely, an application for creating and inserting digital watermarks and digital signatures to videos and other electronic data, documents and instruments; and computer software for use in the authentication, issuance, validation and revocation of digital certificates and signaturesABANDONED
042digital watermarking; digital watermarking, namely, applying electronic digital signatures and digital watermarks to electronic data, documents and instruments; computer programming for creating digital watermarks and digital signatures; computer consultation in the fields of computer securityABANDONED
045Consultation services in the field of electronic authentication of personal identification information for security purposes; intellectual property consultationABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2018MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 15, 2018ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 12, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 26, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 24, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 5, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Feb 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance