USPTO serial 86894306
TRANSITIONAL CERTIFIED BY QAI T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2019
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with TRANSITIONAL CERTIFIED BY QAI T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Bridge Intellectual Property Services PLLC143 CadyCenter, Suite 209Northville, MI 48167United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Raw grains, raw processed or packaged fruits, nuts, vegetables, fibers; cosmetics; rinse off and leave-on personal care products; oral care products; personal hygiene products; household cleaning products | ACTIVE | Mar 23, 2017 |
| B | Growing, production and processing of raw, processed or packaged fruits, nuts, vegetables or fibers by farmers, growers, producers and processors moving from non-organic to organic farming, production and processing methods; production, manufacturing, processing, packaging, distribution, storage, marketing and sales of raw, processed or packaged fruits, nuts, vegetables, fibers, cosmetics, rinse off and leave-on personal care products, oral care products, personal hygiene products or household cleaning products by producers, manufacturers, processors, packers, distributors, restaurants, traders and retailers moving from non-organic to organic farming, production, manufacturing, processing, distribution, storage, marketing and sales methods | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | ISCR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 1, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |