USPTO serial 86894735
BAD GRANNY HARD CIDER SHE'S SO BAD, IT'S GOOD. 100% WASHINGTON STATE APPLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAD GRANNY HARD CIDER SHE'S SO BAD, IT'S GOOD. 100% WASHINGTON STATE APPLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Priya Sinha Cloutier
Priya Sinha Cloutier Cloutier Arnold Jacobowitz2701 1st Ave. Suite 200Seattle, WA 98121UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Karma Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Karma Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named BAD GRANNY HARD CIDER SHE'S SO BAD, IT'S GOOD. 100% WASHINGTON STATE APPLES
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |