USPTO serial 86894758
HARMLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARMLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tiffany L. Schwartz
TIFFANY L. SCHWARTZ DENTONS US LLPP.O. BOX #061080WACKER DRIVE STATION, WILLIS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; mineral supplements; herbal supplements; protein supplements; vitamin supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Dairy-based beverages; fruit-based beverages; vegetable-based beverages; yogurt-based beverages; nut-based beverages, namely, cashew milk for use as a milk substitute and almond milk for use as a milk substitute; yogurt; non-dairy yogurt; fruit purees; vegetable purees; coconut-based beverages used as a milk substitute; dried fruits; dried vegetables; fruit-based energy bars; soups; trail mix; coconut chips; kale chips; potato chips; soy chips; fruit chips; vegetable chips; dried beans; dried lentils; processed nuts; roasted nuts; edible oils; trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit; milk based beverages with chocolate; health foods, namely, non-dairy coconut-based cheese, non-dairy coconut-based spreadable cheeses, and coconut-based butter substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Health foods, namely, coconut-based dips and coconut-based dressings; beverages with a coffee base; beverages with a tea base; beverages with a chocolate base; ice cream; frozen yogurt; sorbet; frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; frozen confections; cereal-based energy bars; energy mints; energy gels, pastes, and chews, namely, gels, pastes, and chews made from fruit; tea; tea extracts; candy; chocolate confections; pastries; cookies; brownies; cakes; trail mix consisting primarily of granola; cereal-based snack foods; granola snacks; granola; chocolate chips; salad dressing; quinoa chips; tea based beverages with fruit flavoring; chocolate based beverages with milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruits and vegetables, namely, coconuts, nuts, and teas; fresh coconuts; raw coconuts; unprocessed tea leaves; raw nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Smoothies; coconut water; coconut-based beverages not used as milk substitutes; frozen fruit beverages; frozen carbonated beverages; non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages; energy drinks; fruit juice; vegetable juice; coffee-flavored soft drinks; fruit based soft drinks flavored with tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Harmless Harvest, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HARMLESS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |