USPTO serial 86895203
FLASHBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLASHBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq.
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CENTER801 CALIFORNIA STREETMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and downloadable software for use in the field of enterprise data storage; Data storage apparatus and equipment, namely, data processing apparatus and apparatus for storing, transmission and reproduction of data | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |