USPTO serial 86896484
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna E. Raimer
Anna E. Raimer Jones Day250 Vesey StreetNew York, NY 10281UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer hardware for detection, blocking, and facilitating removal and remediation of computer viruses, rootkits, bootkits, backdoors, zero-day attacks, data exfiltration, phishing, bots, time bombs, worms, cyber-attacks, malicious attacks, and advanced persistent threats; computer software for identifying and preventing malicious attacks on, and unauthorized activities and intrusions in, computers, computer systems, networks, hardware, software applications, digital devices, and mobile devices; computer software and hardware providing secure networks over virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments; Industrial firewalls, namely, hardware and embedded software used for monitoring industrial network security; computer networks and platforms, comprising computer hardware, computer network adapters, switches, routers and hubs, and computer firmware and computer software, for enhancing industrial automation and for assessing and identifying vulnerabilities and cyber security threats and risks in control system infrastructure, computer control systems, networks and devices, and for testing the effectiveness of cyber security applications, devices, and systems to achieve optimal network security, all in the field of cyber security vulnerability testing and prevention; Computer hardware with embedded software, namely, firmware, and software for assessing and identifying vulnerabilities and cyber security threats and risks in control system infrastructure, computer control systems, networks and devices, and testing the effectiveness of cyber security applications and devices and systems to achieve optimal device and network security, in the field of cyber security vulnerability testing and prevention of networked devices; Computer hardware in the field of cyber security vulnerability testing and prevention of networked devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training in the use and operation of computer software and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and implementing cyber security and privacy requirements and protocols in information technology systems for others; Information technology consulting services; Maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others; Updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting, reporting, analyzing and eliminating cyber incidents, such as malware, unauthorized software and network attacks; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in identification, acquisition, storage, encryption, management, manipulation, analysis and reporting of security breach events relating to computer and computer network data, metadata, data files, and information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in secure cross-enterprise data collaboration, workflow auditing and reporting, data management and sharing, identity management, access control, and data backup and recovery; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of cyber security; Consulting services in the field of cyber security; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms used for monitoring industrial network security; Consulting services in the field of testing and assessing networked devices for cyber security vulnerabilities and risks; Computer consultation in the field of cyber security, namely, providing approvals that minimum security levels have been achieved in the field of cyber security vulnerability testing of networked devices; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of the repair of computer hardware; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in connection with the goods listed in class 009 | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |