USPTO serial 86897093
VITALIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITALIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel F. Dovi
DANIEL F. DOVI HODGSON RUSS LLPTHE GUARANTY BUILDING140 PEARL STREET, SUITE 100BUFFALO, NY 14202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines tools; Engines (except for land vehicles); Machine coupling and transmission components (except for land vehicles); Agricultural implements other than hand-operated; Incubators for eggs; Automatic vending machines; Electric kitchen machines; Electric food processing machines; kitchen machines (electric-) for food preparation (other than cooking); Cutting devices; Electric food cutting devices; Electric food choppers; Electric knives; Electric knife sharpeners; Electric juicers; Electric fruit squeezer for household purposes; Electric blenders for food; Electric blenders for household purposes; Vacuum packing machines; Vacuuming apparatus for vacuuming food arranged in a box, container or pouch; Packaging machines for food; Machines for sealing packaging boxes, containers or pouches; Sweeping, cleaning, washing and laundering machines; Window glass washing machines; Electric window cleaner | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes; Electric kitchen machines for cooking; Cooking apparatus and installations; steaming apparatus (Electric-) for cooking; Pressure cookers, electric; Soup cooker; Electric pans; Electric woks; Frying machine, electric; Grills devices (kitchen devices); Grill spits; Roasting device (cooking devices); Induction cooking plate; Stove top; kitchen stove; Kettles, electric; Bread baking machines; Air filtering installations; Air or water (Ionization apparatus for the treatment of -); Air purifying apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |