Drawing for LARSON ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 86897324

LARSON ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARSON ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric L. Schlevensky

ERIC L SCHLEVENSKY BOYLE FREDRICKSON SC840 NORTH PLANKINTON AVENUEMILWAUKEE, WI 53203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Architectural and engineering servicesACTIVEJul 12, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 25, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 9, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 9, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 9, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance