USPTO serial 86897486
IRISGUARD EYECLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRISGUARD EYECLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer V. Whiting
JENNIFER V. WHITING J WHITING LAW226 W. OJAI AVENUE, SUITE 101-508OJAI, CA 93023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software platforms for use in the connection of users and providers of iris recognition banking systems via a secure cloud computer programs; downloadable cloud computer software for use in relation to iris recognition for identity verification for use in the banking sector; downloadable computer software platforms designed to allow the secure iris recognition and enrolment of iris biometric templates via the Internet for use in the banking sector; downloadable computer software designed to communicate with iris databases to facilitate the secure exchange of iris recognition requests for use in the banking sector; iris recognition cameras for use in connection with the capture, display, storage, processing, transmission, mining and analysis of images of the iris in connection with banking systems and identity verification; iris recognition security devices, namely, iris recognition cameras, for use in the banking sector | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software platforms for use in the connection of users and providers of iris recognition banking systems via a secure cloud computer programs for use in the banking sector; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in relation to iris recognition for identity verification for use in the banking sector; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software platforms designed to allow the secure iris recognition and enrolment of iris biometric templates via the Internet for use in the banking sector; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software designed to communicate with iris databases to facilitate the secure exchange of iris recognition requests for use in the banking sector; design and development of computer hardware and software for biometric data processing and identity verification for use in the banking sector | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |