CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CYBERSHORING

USPTO serial 86898226

CYBERSHORING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5298384Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2017
Examiner
RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CYBERSHORING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin S. Cornuelle & Seth Reagan

Kristin S. Cornuelle & Seth Reagan Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP2050 Main Street, Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting in the field of managing and executing financial and supply chain processesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 3, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2024C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 26, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2021COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2021AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jul 9, 2021ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2017R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 18, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2017CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2017FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 15, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance