USPTO serial 86898374
GRANDSLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2016
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GRANDSLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman R. Van Treeck
Norman R. Van Treeck Pasadena Legal GroupPO Box 3399Landers, CA 92285United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ Daggers; ] Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Leather strops; Razor blades; Razor cases; Razors; Razors, electric or non-electric; Scissors; Sharpening stones; Shaving cases; Shears; Whetstones; Leather strops; Razor strops | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by ShenZhen JuHeShuangCheng Technology Co.Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named GRANDSLAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 23, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |