USPTO serial 86900079
NESTED AUTHENTICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NESTED AUTHENTICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
Redmond, OR
BELLEVUE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are documents such as driver licenses, passports, checks, bank notes and other negotiable instruments; Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are consumer goods such as purses, watches, luggage, jewelry, apparel, shoes, home decoration items, and eyeglass frames; Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are industrial parts such as aircraft parts, motor vehicle parts, vessel parts, engine parts; Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are electronic parts and portable electronic devices; Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are containers for shipping pharmaceuticals; Computer programs for use in processing image data captured by a sensor responsive to a physical object in view of the sensor, comparing the processed data to previously stored image data, and reporting a similarity metric as between the processed data and the previously stored data, to aid in assessing a relationship between the physical object and a second object that was used to form the previously stored image data, wherein the first and second objects are pharmaceuticals; Computer programs for use in tracking products through a supply chain; Computer programs for use in tracking parcels through a delivery chain; Computer programs for use in tracking luggage from a point of origin to a destination location | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALITHEON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTHENTECT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTHENTECT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RAF Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALITHEON, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NESTED AUTHENTICATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |