Drawing for ALIGN

USPTO serial 86900254

ALIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K FORD DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 EIGHTH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, crop pants, pants, shorts, tights, leggingsACTIVESep 2, 2015
028yoga accessories, namely, yoga matsACTIVEAug 8, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 22, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 22, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 22, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Dec 7, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 22, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 22, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 22, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance