Drawing for RADIANCE

USPTO serial 86902103

RADIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAJA, AMER YASIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jody H. Drake

JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in connection with data analysis, namely, software for data assessment and data review for investigation purposes, data modeling and data analytics, searching, staging, indexing, reviewing and exporting of documents, excluding software for the administration of insurance and investment holdingsACTIVE—
042Providing online, internet-based customizable software application for use in connection with data analysis, namely, software for data assessment and data review for investigation purposes, data modeling and data analytics, searching, staging, indexing, reviewing and exporting of documents, excluding software for the administration of insurance and investment holdingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 15, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 15, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 17, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 15, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2016GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance