USPTO serial 86903705
PEDIGREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEDIGREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A CLIFFORD
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4247UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | non-metal containers, namely, document protection bins; non-metal waste bins and non-metal recycling bins for commercial use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |