Drawing for SARAH COVENTRY

USPTO serial 86904011

SARAH COVENTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TORRES, ELIANA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SARAH COVENTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dara L. Onofrio

DARA L. ONOFRIO ONOFRIO LAW24 WEST MAIN STREET - SUITE 329CLINTON, CT 06413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Reading glasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Frames for spectacles and sunglassesACTIVE—
025Gloves; Hats; Hosiery; Pajamas; Pants; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Socks; Sweat pants; Sweaters; T-shirts; Trousers; Undergarments; Belts; Jackets; Polo shirts; Sport shirts; Ties being clothing; Tops being clothing; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blousesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2017RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Aug 15, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance