Drawing for GRETA

USPTO serial 86904044

GRETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deidra D. Ritcherson

DEIDRA D RITCHERSON AMIN TUROCY & WATSON LLP200 PARK AVENUE SUITE 300BEACHWOOD, OH 44122UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for children and babies, namely, t-shirts, shirts, sleepwear, and headbandsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 12, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 14, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 2, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 28, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 27, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 29, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 12, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance