Drawing for JERSEY DEVIL

USPTO serial 86904466

JERSEY DEVIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JERSEY DEVIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H.E. Bursik, Esquire

DAVID H E BURSIK401 HAMBURG TURNPIKE, SUITE 201WAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Aug 14, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 14, 2019OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Mar 1, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 21, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 29, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 7, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 6, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance