USPTO serial 86904647
JANBALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JANBALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Supnik
PAUL D. SUPNIK LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK9401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1250BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile applications and downloadable software for accessing digital content in the fields of entertainment, travel, hotels, and restaurants via electronic and optical communications networks; downloadable software allowing users to submit electronic data to and access data from a website for educational and entertainment purposes; downloadable software used for accessing a website where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events, locations, services, and activities in the fields of entertainment, travel, hotels, and restaurants; downloadable software for the transmission of messages among users in the fields of entertainment, travel, hotels, and restaurants; downloadable software used for providing travel information and maps and for booking and checking travel reservations; downloadable software used for searching hotel rates and airfares | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; business to business online travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for air transportation; computer services, namely, providing downloadable newsletters in the fields of travel, travel planning, travel and entertainment news, maps, city directories and listings via electronic communication networks for use by travelers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information about entertainment activities, and making reservations and bookings for shows and other entertainment events; computer services, namely, providing online non-downloadable newsletters in the fields of travel, travel planning, travel and entertainment news, maps, city directories and listings via electronic communication networks for use by travelers; providing information in the field of entertainment; providing entertainment activities, namely, arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line user reviews of entertainment activities and events; publishing of reviews | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | hotel and lodging services, namely, providing reviews of hotels by means of a telephone, facsimile, the mails, courier and over computer networks and global communication networks; travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAVANA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRAVANA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOURIST INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named JANBALA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |